Kick et al., 1935

Kick CH, Bethke RM, Edgington BH, Wilder OHM, Record PR, Wilder W, Hill TJ, Chase SW - “Fluorine in Animal Nutrition” Bulletin 558, Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station (1935)

TABLE 39: - Availability of Fluorine in Various Forms

Fluorine Supplement

Time on ration

Fluorine ingested

Fluorine in
 feces

Fluorine absorbed

Fluorine in
 urine

Fluorine balance

Fluorine retained

 

Days

Mg.

Mg.

Mg.

Mg.

Mg.

Pct.

Rock phosphate (untreated)

11

217.2

128.7

88.5

31.5

+57.0

26.2

Rock phosphate (untreated)

10

213.6

131.5

82.1

20.5

+61.6

28.8

Sodium fluosilicate

23

269.9

94.3

175.6

93.6

+82.0

30.4

Sodium fluosilicate

22

259.9

94.4

175.5

90.2

+85.3

31.6

Sodium fluoride

18

211.2

116.5

94.7

25.8

+68.9

32.6

Calcium fluoride

11

229.6

225.5

4.1

4.2

-00.1

0.0

Animals investigated: rats
Data from Page 61

(Original Scans: Page 59 Page 61 (w/Table)

In the study above, less than 2 percent of calcium fluoride was absorbed and this was excreted quantitatively in the urine. No calcium fluoride was retained. But even calcium fluoride is not benign. The animals given calcium fluoride also developed mottled teeth - a clear sign that calcium fluoride could produce changes on the teeth merely by passing through the body, and not by being “stored in a tooth” or anywhere else.

In 1946 Samuel Chase, one of the authors of the above study, became president of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR). This organization promoted the idea that only the “fluoride ion” in the various fluoridation compounds was of importance. Yet he well knew that other fluorides did not behave like calcium fluoride - the “natural fluoride”, as can be seen in the above table. Unlike calcium fluoride, sodium fluoride was retained in great amounts in the body and was very toxic - as all findings indicated. Rock phosphate and sodium fluosilicate experiments yielded the same information.